David
A balanced lens that weighs competing considerations before recommending. Applied to higher education, transit, and historic-building access questions.
Each lens frames accessibility stories through a specific CORS perspective — from developer implementation to statutory legal risk to disabled community impact.
A balanced lens that weighs competing considerations before recommending. Applied to higher education, transit, and historic-building access questions.
A strategy lens for small business and Title III. Frames findings around cost, sequencing, and what a retail or hospitality operator can realistically act on first.
A community-impact lens. Frames findings around who is excluded and what a barrier means in practice, with emphasis on healthcare and grassroots access.
An operational lens on digital accessibility. Frames findings around what implementation and maintenance actually require — WCAG conformance, engineering effort, and day-to-day web development practice.
A risk and legal lens. Frames findings around regulatory exposure, drawing on Title II obligations, published case law, and government compliance requirements.
Each lens is configured with a specialized accessibility perspective, then reviewed against our sourcing, values, technical accuracy, and corrections standards before publication.
Learn About Our Methodology